SUB,FCT,ICN,CTXC,BITB,CVC,CVT,STORM,BQX,HPB,FSN,DRGN,SAN,TPAY,GNO,PART,SALT,DIG,KICK,PZM,WICC,CRPT,ANT,TNB,PPC,VTC,BLOCK,BFT,UBQ,BLZ,GRS,QKC,NEXO,SKY,ENJ,RVN,AGI,MDS,C2O,SMT,DTR,CND,NEBL,RLC,BTO,XAS,BITCNY,REQ,NOAH,SNM

Yinchuan bus arson sentenced Ningxia high court dismissed the appeal upheld the death sentence – Bei winpm

Yinchuan bus arson sentenced Ningxia high court dismissed the appeal upheld the death sentence – Beijing newspaper in Yinchuan on 28 September, reporter Shen Dong today, the the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Higher People’s court according to the law of Yinchuan "1? 05" Ma Yongping arson case made a second ruling and open court verdict, dismissed the appeal of Ma Yongping’s appeal, maintain Yinchuan intermediate people’s Court of the death penalty. July 3rd, the Yinchuan City Intermediate People’s Court on the defendant Ma Yongping arson open verdict, the defendant found guilty of arson, sentenced to death, deprived of political rights for life. After the verdicts, Ma Yongping appealed against the verdict, the Ningxia High Court on September 22nd public hearing of the case. Ningxia High Court held that the appellant Ma Yongping deliberately take extreme measures, public transportation in running on fire, causing 18 deaths and 32 people were injured, the bus was burned, seriously endangering public safety, his behavior constituted the crime of arson. The appellant Ma Yongping for the realization of individual economic interests, ignoring the safety of innocent people’s lives and health and property, plan, prepare in advance, to ignite the gasoline in the crowded bus, the implementation of arson crime, causing serious consequences of a large number of passengers and the bus burned casualties, the crime nature is extremely bad, crime is extremely cruel means, the consequences are particularly serious. A great social harm, should be severely punished according to law. Defense opinions of the appellant Ma Yongping and defender of the investigation are not tenable. The Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region people’s Procuratorate of second instance dismissed the appeal and upheld the opinions adopted. In the first instance verdict, the facts are clear, the evidence is true and sufficient, the conviction is accurate, the sentencing is appropriate, the application of law is correct, and the trial procedure is legal. Ningxia Higher People’s court according to the relevant provisions of the law, the court rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict, and shall report to the Supreme People’s court.相关的主题文章: